<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cypherpunk on TAZ</title><link>https://taz.zerotrust.nz/tags/cypherpunk/</link><description>Recent content in Cypherpunk on TAZ</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© 2026 TAZ | taz.zerotrust.nz | built with open source</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://taz.zerotrust.nz/tags/cypherpunk/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>// cryptography: the weapon they couldn't ban</title><link>https://taz.zerotrust.nz/posts/cryptography-the-weapon-they-couldnt-ban/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://taz.zerotrust.nz/posts/cryptography-the-weapon-they-couldnt-ban/</guid><description>&lt;p>In 1991, a programmer named Phil Zimmermann released a piece of software called Pretty Good Privacy. It let anyone encrypt a message so completely that no government, no corporation, no intelligence agency could read it without the key. He put it on the internet for free.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The United States government opened a criminal investigation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The charge was arms trafficking.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Not metaphorically. Literally. The US State Department had classified strong encryption as a munition, in the same legal category as tanks, fighter jets, and missiles. Exporting it without a licence was a federal crime. Zimmermann had put PGP on a public server. People outside the US had downloaded it. As far as the government was concerned, he had shipped weapons across borders.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>